An Empirical Study of Grid Fins Aerodynamic Performance in Low-Subsonic Flight
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2025.29.5.77Keywords:
grid fins, aerodynamic performance, drone-dropped payloads, low-subsonic flight, wind tunnel testing, numerical simulations, experimental analysis, grid configurations, diagonal grid configuration, horizontal grid configurationAbstract
Deploying payloads from aerial platforms at low altitudes poses significant challenges, particularly in maintaining an accurate freefall trajectory. Traditional fin designs are often used in dropped payloads at low altitudes. However, these designs frequently fail to preserve the intended trajectory, reducing precision and effectiveness. This challenge is particularly evident in high-wind conditions, where achieving landing precision or maintaining a desired trajectory becomes more difficult. To address these limitations, alternative fin designs, such as grid fins, offer a promising solution due to their unique aerodynamic properties. The current study investigates the aerodynamic performance of grid fins in low-subsonic flight, focusing on their application in drone-dropped payloads. The primary objective is to assess how different grid fin design parameters affect aerodynamic performance. Experimental analyses are conducted through subsonic wind tunnel testing of various grid fin designs. The study highlights the differences in aerodynamic performance resulting from grid count variations and the grid members' horizontal versus diagonal placement. The experimental results indicate that grid fins with a diagonal configuration outperform their horizontal counterparts with the same grid numbers and dimensions. The findings reveal the presence of an optimal configuration, achieving a peak lift-to-drag (L/D) ratio of approximately 1.99, compared to 1.4 for the least optimal design.
Downloads
Downloads

Authors who publish with Engineering Journal agree to transfer all copyright rights in and to the above work to the Engineering Journal (EJ)'s Editorial Board so that EJ's Editorial Board shall have the right to publish the work for nonprofit use in any media or form. In return, authors retain: (1) all proprietary rights other than copyright; (2) re-use of all or part of the above paper in their other work; (3) right to reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above paper for authors' personal use or for company use if the source and EJ's copyright notice is indicated, and if the reproduction is not made for the purpose of sale.